PAR Meter Recommendation Please

Continuing the discussion from New Grower, Baby Boomer:

Also I’m thinking of getting a PAR meter. Any recommendations (except for that expensive $500 one). I can’t afford that one, but I saw plenty of them under a $100 or so.

If you got the photone app, it can be pretty accurate. Can even be calibrated if you got a honest 3rd party ppfd chart. I use it, its free on Android

3 Likes

I have an apple phone. I will check the App Store. That would be great!!! Thanks

1 Like

The bad part is with apple you need a paper diffuser i believe. A specific weight paper, i believe its 22# but read the info to be sure.

Ok, Thanks! I got it! However you are right. Requires 22# paper. All I had on hand was 20 and 24. So I used the 20 lb. That being said with my new seedlings. What Par value should I shoot for? I left it at about 900 when the phone is on the pots. They are up and looking good. About 8 days since sprouting.

2 Likes

900? Better dial that back some. As far as the variance with wrong paper im not sure how to factor that. Most say 300,600,900 for seedling, veg, flower. I like 300, 500, 950. If you got a good ppfd 3rd party chart i would check for accuracy.

1 Like

Photon par meter 100%, FREE in app store

The photone changes drastically on iPhone depending on paper. When it’s the correct paper, the results are different from reem to reem. I compared against a photone and it was around 100-200 points away from an actual meter. I believe it was reading higher. But every single phone will read differently. For apple there is no calibration option. At least there wasn’t when I was using it. I tried both sun and led settings and they are pretty equally un accurate.

That said I did do several runs with photone and had decent results. I realized how different the readings were after getting a meter. Some meters:

I’ve not seen this one used but it’s the cheapest I’ve seen, decent ratings

https://www.amazon.com/Full-Spectrum-Precision-Photosynthetic-Activity-400-700nm/dp/B0BTYW7SDP/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?crid=GJCKOB7IZA9U&keywords=par%2Bmeter&qid=1707354233&sprefix=par%2Bmeter%2Caps%2C124&sr=8-3&th=1&psc=1

The one I use

https://www.amazon.com/PHOTOBIO-LGBQM2-Advanced-Quantum-Micromols/dp/B08HPGLZHL/ref=mp_s_a_1_4?crid=GJCKOB7IZA9U&keywords=par+meter&qid=1707354233&sprefix=par+meter%2Caps%2C124&sr=8-4

The one everyone wants to use

https://www.amazon.com/Apogee-Instruments-Full-Spectrum-Quantum-Telescopic/dp/B09MYDTW5C/ref=mp_s_a_1_13?crid=GJCKOB7IZA9U&keywords=par+meter&qid=1707354233&sprefix=par+meter%2Caps%2C124&sr=8-13

And this is the new improved version of :point_up_2:t3: measures a wider spectrum

https://www.amazon.com/Apogee-Instruments-MQ-610-Telescopic-Greenhouse/dp/B09MSJLS9G/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?crid=C1OY6WAOS18R&keywords=epar+meter&qid=1707354929&sprefix=epar+meter%2Caps%2C191&sr=8-3

3 Likes

I got that wrong. I went back and checked. I had it around 500. I dialed it back to 400. Thank you very much!

2 Likes

Yep. That’s the one I want. The Apogee. But the one you have will more than suffice. However I think I’m using this months budget on an Affinity T-6 pro. I think the Phone app will do for now.

1 Like

I think the calibrate part of photone is a newer option. I dont remember in the past either, but then i got a new phone. I love the calibrate part bc i have a screen protector on mine, and at 15" dead center of a hlg 350r board…its 982ppfd according to chart. So i feel mine is pretty accurate, i hope lol.

1 Like

Have you been happy with the one you use?

I was also considering this one.

The least expensive one you listed for $85 would be hard to read with the sensor attached to the display.

Thanks for any input you might have

1 Like

I’ve never used it but as long as the reviews are good I’d be willing to try it. :call_me_hand:t3:

2 Likes

I ordered the diffuser that clips over the phone camera for Photone. I think that is close enough. It hasn’t arrived yet so I use the paper diffuser. Right now I set the PAR on 600. I am on day 19 now. I’m getting all my ducks in a row for adding nutrients . Here is how they looked yesterday.